Monday, 4 February 2013

      TRIBUTE TO OUR GREAT LAND

                     BHARATH
The words MOTHER and MOTHERLAND strike an emotional chord with our hearts. The word MOTHERLAND is even greater as it connects us with the soil of our nation. As Lord RAMA said "Mother and Motherland are above heaven". 
         

This the ancient land my dear friend, where wisdom made its home long before going to any other country. Even when Greece did not exist, when Rome was never thought of , Bharath existed as a very much scientifically and spiritually advanced nation. It is in this nation , long before Christ and Mohammed a distant sage arose and declared " EKAM SAD VIPRA BAHUDA VADANTI" (HE WHO EXISTS IS ONE, THE SAGES CALL HIM VARIOUSLY) 
This one of the most memorable sentences ever occured, one of the grandest truths ever discovered. Ther is infallible power in this land- the power of the vedas, bestowed by Goddess Saraswati, the shrill of the conches of Krishna and Shankara & the great hymn of Omkara all these have made this land  THE GATEWAY TO HEAVEN . 

      If there is any land that can lay claim to be the blessed PUNYABHUMI (HOLY LAND), to be the land where all the souls on this earth must come in the end to account for their karma,   
the land where humanity has attained its highest state towards gentleness, kindness and genorosity, the land where Godlike men live and breathe, the land of introspection and Spirituality, it is INDIA. Here is the life giving water my friends, which can quench the fire of materialism, burning the hearts of millions in other lands..... i will borrow the lamp of the athenian sage and will follow you around all the countries in the world show me if you can , such men in other countries. 


      

                        

Thursday, 10 January 2013

THE GREAT GODSE

                                            THE GREAT MARTYR
                             PANDIT NATHURAM GODSE

All Indians, without giving a thought have accepted a man as the father of our nation MAHATMA GANDHI. But no one really cares to know about the fact that he was just another SHAKUNI in our midst!! 
Ask any child in our country - WHO BROUGHT US FREEDOM?? the answer you get is 
MAHATMA GANDHI or JAWAHARLAL NEHRU and not BHAGAT SINGH OR AZAD.
They don't know a thing about great revolutionaries and the congress government is encouraging it by deleting it from our history books. Aren't we ashamed to dishonour the great bhagat singh , who at the age of 8 asked his father to stop sowing wheat and asked him to sow bullets, so that he can grow trees of GUNS to fight against the british!!!
MAHATMA GANDHI was a very weak minded person convinced to the core that Indians can never win freedom without muslim help and supported the barbarians in every step.
AND THE RESULT= we lost 5 states and 62 districts along with 3 shakti peethas, great cities like lahore (lavapuri=built by son of ram lava),multan(prahladapuri) and morover our Dharma in these lands completely vanquished.HE supported the KHILAFAT MOVEMENT to get muslim support. it had nothing to with the freedom movement. infact khilafat movement was a movement for establishing AN ISLAMIC STATE IN TURKEY!!!!! wow what a NATIONAL MOVEMENT!!!! that was the state of gandhi's mind- secure muslim support at any cost. and finally one more big betrayal INDIA not declared as a hindu nation in 1947. yes if pakistan is for muslims, the congress and its leaders should have had had the guts to declare that india was  a nation for hindus. even after partition, SARDAR VALLABHAI PATEL refused to transfer 55 crore rupees to pakistan ,fearing that they would use it against INDIA in KASHMIR conflict.But this gandhi underwent a fast to death asking the government to give the money, which they eventually did. At this point of time, in a distant Maharashtra, a person called NATHURAM GODSE had decided it was enough of tolerating this man and decided to kill him. here we must remember the message of lord krishna" VANQUISH ANYONE AGAINST DHARMA EVEN IF HE IS YOUR NEAR AND DEAR ONES" and that's what nathuram did. He killed the man who supported the tormentors of our ancestors. yes it is a well known fact that ours is the only civilization to have survived the barbaric muslims by the sacrifice our great ancestors, THE ISLAMIC RULE IN INDIA IS CONSIDERED AS THE BLOODIEST GENOCIDE IN HUMAN HISTORY. now i will discuss destruction of dharma in a later post. as of now i have the court statement of nathuram godse as to why he killed nathuram..........

     THE COURT STATEMENT OF NATHURAM GODSE




Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession. I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other.
I have read the speeches and writings of Dadabhai Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England, France, America and’ Russia. Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.
All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well-being of all India, one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.
Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day. In fact, hunour, duty and love of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.
In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for the freedom they brought to them.
The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way. Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and every thing; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.
Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible. Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster.
Gandhi’s pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India. It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India, Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect, it is spoken, but not written. It is a bastard tongue and cross-breed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma’s sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India. His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.
From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork.
The Congress which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947. Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls ‘freedom’ and ‘peaceful transfer of power’. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called ‘freedom won by them with sacrifice’ – whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country – which we consider a deity of worship – my mind was filled with direful anger.
One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan, there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.
Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron will and proved to be powerless.
Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan. People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building. After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House.
I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots.
I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi. I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi’s persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims.
I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in FUTURE.
VANDE MATARAM

the court was silenced after the tiger had spoken.......

Tuesday, 8 January 2013

PSEUDOSECULARISM


                 HOW INDIA IS DYING DUE TO            
                    FAKE  SECULARISM??
a. There is a direct attack by the Christian/Islamic alliance against the Hindu people, Hindu religion and Hindu culture in Bharat. Their aim is simple and straightforward - By the next 2 decades finish the Hindu religion within Bharat and turn India into a Islamic -Christian republic similar to Lebanon.
(This alliance includes Media, Congress party, Saudi Arabia and USA).
b. There is a change in demographic pattern in India due to high growth rate of Muslim population and active conversion of Hindus by the christian missionaries and funds like World vision which is shamelessly asking funds from Hindus for its conversion activities.
BHARATH MATA
Today the Muslim population in India is YOUNG and the Hindu population is ageing. The growth rate of Muslim population is twice the Hindu growth rate. There is no need of a math professor to figure out that Muslims will become majority in India within the next 10-15 years for sure.
These are not fairy tales or scary thoughts but reality of the situation. Even in Lebanon, nobody thought so but it has become a reality.
So, Today there is no point in discussing the problems. Those who are intelligent enough in RSS, VHP or Sangh pariwar know the problem. They do not need me to tell them.
The problem now lies with the SOLUTION to the problem.
There is no question to the fact that the Hindus were again betrayed and betrayed badly in 1947 when Congress and Gandhi asked the Muslim population to remain in India. It was a betrayal since 1/3 of India was already lost to the Muslims but still the Muslims did not go their recently acquired lands.
It is of no use blaming the Muslims. They have been doing the same since the past 1400 years ever since the birth of Mohammad in Arabia.
The blame should go to us - The Hindus who have been Guinea pigs every time!.
Even now the problem can be solved if there is an active participation of Hindus who want to overcome the inevitability and correct the injustice done against us.
Yes, the solution to the problem is the FIRST Hindu revolution needed in post-Independent India. A revolution to save Hindu culture, religion and its people.
The revolution would require the active participation of the Hindu populace.
HINDU RASHTRA
Following steps should be carried out by those who care about the Hindu people.
a. Forming of the Hindu Militia - An armed army with latest weapons and training numbering more than 15 - 20 million soldiers. This militia will be the foot soldiers who will walk into Delhi and capture the capital to establish the Hindu state.
The manpower can be got from the existing RSS organisation. RSS can ask its people to start getting military training and actively recruit more cadres.
Some section of the Indian army who are Hindus and who believe in a Hindu nation can be brought here.
b. Formation of a Hindu political party for the Hindu interests. Although the BJP is present, its current set of leaders are more secular inclined and are basically more or less similar to the Islamic congress.
Do either of the 2 things:-
a. Purge the BJP of traitors and crooks it currently have.
b. Form a new political party which defends the Hindu interests only.
Carrying out these 2 steps will actively accelerate the progression of a Hindu revolution and establishment of a Hindu state in India.
As a terminating note, I would like to mention that
ONLY A HINDU STATE WITH HINDU CONTROL CAN ACTIVELY DEFEND THE RIGHTS OF THE HINDUS.
The current Secular India is actively involved in destruction of the Hindu religion within the next 10-15 years.
THE GLORIOUS BHARAT MATA!!

Thank you.